![]() ![]() Not logical, contradicted by other relevant information. Not logical but possible, no other information on the subject, not confirmed. Reasonably logical, agrees with some relevant information, not confirmed. Logical, consistent with other relevant information, not confirmed. Logical, consistent with other relevant information, confirmed by independent sources. ![]() Insufficient information to evaluate reliability. Lacks authenticity, trustworthiness, and competency. History of mostly valid information.ĭoubts. No doubt about the source's authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency. In turn, the specific piece of information itself is ranked in decreasing order from "1" to "5", where "6" is reserved for the case where judgement cannot be made. ![]() According to this model the sources are classified in order of decreasing reliability from "A" to "E", where "F" is designated for the case where judgement cannot be made. We suggest teams incorporate the NID 1 model that is widely used in government and some of commercial entities. As a result, the need for rating sources and the information they provide. The first factor is the reliability of the source and second it's ability to manage this type of information. Information provided by a source does not necessarily objectively represent the reality. Source Evaluation and Information Reliability ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |